Advanced English · 24 min

Relative clauses

The point

Who is for people. Which is for things. Whose marks possession. A defining clause has no commas and tells you which one. An extra clause has commas and only adds a fact about someone already named.

Form and use

A relative clause adds information about a noun. A defining clause tells you which person or thing. It has no commas. A non-defining clause adds extra information about a noun that is already clear. It needs commas. The choice of pronoun follows the noun and the role inside the clause.

Pronouns: who — people, subject whom — people, object, formal which — things that — people or things, defining clauses only whose — possession where — places when — times why — reasons, often after reason Which can also point back at a whole clause: the file was late, which annoyed the client.

In a defining clause, who, which, or that can introduce it. If the pronoun is the object, you may omit it: the report we sent. Do not use that in a non-defining clause, and do not drop the pronoun there. Commas mark the extra clause: Mina, who owns the file, replied. Without commas, who owns the file would limit which Mina you mean.

Two contrasts cause most errors. People take who, not which: the person who called. Possession takes whose, not who: the firm whose note was late. A thing takes which or that, not who. After a comma, use who for a person and which for a thing, never that. Whom is optional and formal when the person is the object: the client whom we emailed.

Don't translate it like this

Don't say

The person which owns the date.

Say

The person who owns the date.

날짜를 맡은 사람.

A person takes who, not which.

Short examples

The person who owns the date replies.

날짜를 맡은 사람이 답합니다.

The plant whose note was late is Dallas.

메모가 늦었던 공장은 댈러스입니다.

Mina, who owns the parts, sends the note.

부품을 맡은 미나가 메모를 보냅니다.

The person who called left a note.

전화한 사람이 메모를 남겼습니다.

The client whom we emailed replied.

우리가 이메일을 보낸 고객이 답했습니다.

The report that we sent was short.

우리가 보낸 보고서는 짧았습니다.

The firm whose note was late called.

메모가 늦었던 회사가 전화했습니다.

The room where we met is free.

우리가 만난 방이 비어 있습니다.

Monday, when the file arrived, was busy.

파일이 도착한 월요일은 바빴습니다.

Mina, who owns the file, replied.

파일을 맡은 미나가 답했습니다.

The file was late, which annoyed the client.

파일이 늦었고, 그것이 고객을 짜증 나게 했습니다.

Questions

Every question has to be right to close this point.

1. PeopleWhich line is right?
2. PossessionThe note belongs to the plant. Which line is right?
3. Extra informationThere is one Mina, and the parts are an extra fact. Which line is right?
4. Who for peopleThe noun is a person, and the pronoun is the subject of the clause. Which line is right?
5. Whom as objectThe person is the object of emailed, and the style is formal. Which line is right?
6. WhoseThe firm possesses the note. You need the possessive pronoun. Which line is right?
7. No that after a commaMina is already identified. The clause only adds extra information. Which line is right?
8. Which for a whole clauseThe whole fact, not one noun, annoyed the client. Which line is right?
9. WhereThe noun is a place, and the clause tells you about that place. Which line is right?

Answer every question, then check.