Writing · 14 min

Cameras in the internal meeting

This is a business writing discussion, not a letter to a friend. You are joining a workplace argument about cameras in internal meetings. The first sentence must be a position a stranger can quote. Then add a reason neither student used, and one example with a time and a result. Do not agree with both sides and stop. Nothing here is an email greeting.

Join the discussion. State your position in the first sentence. Add a reason the two students did not use, and one concrete example.

Professor

We've been discussing whether a firm should require cameras on during internal meetings. Some people say a face makes the meeting fairer. Others say a required camera is just another task. What is your position, and why?

Alex

I think cameras should be required. If I cannot see someone, I assume they are doing other work, and I stop trusting the silence.

Sora

I disagree. A required camera punishes people in small apartments and adds anxiety that has nothing to do with the decision.

14:00

0 words. Aim for 100 or more.

The draft stays on this device.

Before you check the quiz

  • The first sentence can be quoted as your position.
  • You added a reason that is not Alex's trust and not Sora's apartment.
  • The example is something that happened, not a second slogan.
  • You are at or above 100 words.

Did the task do this?

1. PositionWhich opening works for an academic discussion?
2. DevelopmentWhat counts as adding something the other posts did not say?
3. LanguageWhich sentence is the one you can post?
4. LengthYou have 70 words and the reason is clear. What is the better use of the remaining time?
5. PositionYou want cameras optional. Which first sentence is a position?
6. ShapeWhich example belongs in this discussion?

Answer every question, then check.