Can we look at that assumption again?
그 가정, 다시 볼 수 있을까요?
Assumptions are easier to reopen than decisions people have already defended.
03 The passage on the screen · 9 min
Inference without inventing
The most attractive wrong answer on inference items is good management advice that the passage does not contain. You are not being hired. You are being asked what this author committed to.
Objective
Choose what must be true, and reject advice the author never gave.
On the exam
If the stem says inferred, implied, or suggested, the answer is one step from the text, not three. “The author would probably recommend a new software tool” is usually the invented one.
Don't translate it like this
Don't say
The author wants every company to ban hybrid meetings.
Say
The author claims the room gives speaking time to people who can hear an overlap.
A claim about a mechanism is not a ban. Inference items add the ban because it feels decisive.
Phrases
Read them aloud. Listen if you want a model. Nothing is recorded.
I'm not convinced the data supports that.
그 데이터가 그 결론을 받치는지는 아직 모르겠습니다.
I'm not convinced is professional. I don't think so is thin.
In the room
One step, not three
Use this paragraph. Do not improve it.
Passage
Teams that only asked whether a meeting ended on time could not see whose judgment had been left out.
Passage
Teams that counted turns could.
What would you say?
All three have to be right to close the lesson.
Answer every question, then check.